4.2 Review

Friedreich's ataxia and iron metabolism

期刊

BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 465-468

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0387-7604(00)00175-3

关键词

Friedreich's ataxia; iron metabolism; cell damage; treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The possible causes of abnormal iron metabolism in patients with Friedreich's ataxia are considered. Reduced expression of a frataxin homologue in yeast is associated with mitochondrial iron accumulation at the expense of cytosolic iron, and the same phenomenon can be demonstrated in these patients. A decrease in cytosolic iron causes the expression of a high-affinity iron-uptake protein, and therefore Friedreich's ataxia can be considered to be a disease of abnormal intracellular iron distribution. Friedreich's ataxia is of autosomal recessive inheritance, and the gene associated with it has been mapped to chromosome 9. This encodes the protein frataxin which regulates mitochondrial iron transport. The commonest mutation causing this disorder is an expanded GAA repeat in the gene for this protein. Different point mutations may account for some of the variations in the phenotypic features that are often found, and these variations are discussed. These findings have raised therapeutic possibilities in a condition for which previously there was no specific treatment. There are intracellular enzymes which are very sensitive to injury by oxygen-free radicals. Treatment has therefore been tried with ibebenone which acts as a free-radical scavenger, with some evidence of improvement. Iron chelating agents, such as deferoxamine, have also been given, but the finding of normal serum iron and ferritin casts doubt on the rationale of this. However the finding that the accumulation of iron in the mitochondria of the cells in patients with this form of ataxia will cause oxidative stress and cell death, gives hope for more effective treatment in the future, possibly with gene therapy. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据