4.6 Article

A feline model of experimentally induced islet amyloidosis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 157, 期 6, 页码 2143-2150

出版社

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64852-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of the pathogenesis of islet amyloidosis and its relationship to the development and progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus has been hampered by the lack of an experimentally inducible animal model. The domestic cat, by virtue of the fact that it is one of the few species that spontaneously develop a form of diabetes mellitus that closely resembles human type 2 diabetes, including the formation of amyloid deposits derived from islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP), was considered to be an excellent candidate species in which to attempt to develop a nontransgenic animal model for this disease process. To develop the model, 8 healthy domestic cats were given a 50% pancreatectomy, which was followed by treatment with growth hormone and dexamethasone. Once a stable diabetic state was established, cats were randomly assigned to groups treated with either glipizide or insulin at doses appropriate to control hyperglycemia. Cats were maintained on this treatment regimen for 18 months and then euthanized. Based on light microscopic examination of Congo red-stained sections of pancreas, all cats were negative for the presence of islet amyloid at the time of pancreatectomy. At the end of the study all 4 glipizide-treated cats had islet amyloid deposits, whereas only 1 of 4 insulin-treated cats had detectable amyloid. In addition, the glipizide treated cats had threefold higher basal and fivefold higher glucose-stimulated plasma IAPP concentrations than insulin-treated cats, suggesting an association between elevated IAPP secretion and islet amyloidosis. Blood-glycosylated hemoglobin concentrations were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. This study documents for the first time all inducible model of islet amyloidosis in a nontransgenic animal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据