4.5 Article

Production of 13S-hydroxy-9(Z)-octadecenoic acid from linoleic acid by whole recombinant cells expressing linoleate 13-hydratase from Lactobacillus acidophilus

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 1-10

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.05.006

关键词

13S-Hydroxy-9(Z)-octadecenoic acid; Lactobacillus acidophilus; Linoleate 13-hydratase; Linoleic acid; Whole cell conversion

资金

  1. Bio-industry Technology Development Program
  2. Ministry for Agriculture
  3. Food and Rural Affairs [112002-3]
  4. Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [2012-009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Linoleate 13-hydratase from Lactobacillus acidophilus LMG 11470 converted linoleic acid to hydroxyl fatty acid, which was identified as 13S-hydroxy-9(Z)-octadecenoic acid (13-HOD) by GC-MS and NMR. The expression of linoleate 13-hydratase gene in Escherichia coli was maximized by using pACYC plasmid and super optimal broth with catabolite repression (SOC) medium containing 40 mM Mg2+. To optimize induction conditions, recombinant cells were cultivated at 37 degrees C, 1 mM isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside was added at 2 h, and the culture was further incubated at 16 degrees C for 18 h. Recombinant cells expressing linoleate 13-hydratase from L. acidophilus were obtained under the optimized expression conditions and used for 13-HOD production from linoleic acid. The optimal reaction conditions were pH 6.0, 40 degrees C, 0.25% (v/v) Tween 40, 25 gl(-1) cells, and 100 gl(-1) linoleic acid, and under these conditions, whole recombinant cells produced 79 gl(-1) 13-HOD for 3 h with a conversion yield of 79% (w/w), a volumetric productivity of 26.3 gl(-1) h(-1), and a specific productivity of 1.05 g g-cells(-1) h(-1). To the best of our knowledge, the recombinant cells produced hydroxy fatty acid with the highest concentration and productivity reported so far. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据