4.7 Article

High-performance liquid chromatographic-spectrophotometric determination of copper(II) and palladium(II) with 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4N-pyridyl)porphine following homogeneous liquid-liquid extraction in the water-acetic acid-chloroform ternary solvent system

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 424, 期 2, 页码 263-269

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01082-5

关键词

homogeneous liquid-liquid extraction; water-acetic acid-chloroform ternary solvent system; high powered preconcentration method for HPLC; simultaneous determination of copper(II) and palladium(II); water-soluble porphyrin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The homogeneous liquid-liquid extraction method based on the pH dependent phase-separation phenomenon was studied in the water-acetic acid-chloroform ternary solvent system. The optimum conditions were determined as follows, i.e. in order to obtain a water-immiscible small phase (approximately 50 mul) of chloroform, sodium hydroxide ([NaOH](T) = 1.29 M) was added to a homogeneous aqueous solution which consisted of water, chloroform (0.2 ml, 0.57 vol.%) and acetic acid (2 ml, 5.71 vol.%), where the final total volume was 35 ml. During the extraction of the 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4N-pyridyl)porphine (TPyP), Cu(II)- and Pd(II)-TPyP complexes, when the volume ratio (V(W)/V(O)) between the water phase and organic phase was 700, the distribution ratio (D) and extraction percentage (E%) were TPyP (5600, 88.9%), Cu(II)-TPyP (6000, 90%) and Pd(II)-TPyP (6700, 91%), respectively. This extraction method was applied to the HPLC system. The calibration graphs were linear and pass through the origin over the concentration range of 2 x 10(-8)-4 x 10(-7) M for Cu(II) and 5 x 10(-8)-8 x 10-7 M for Pd(II). The relative standard deviations for the central value of the calibration graph were 3.2% for Cu(II) and 3.7% for Pd(II) (10 determinations). Moreover, the detection limits (S/N = 3) were 5 x 10(-9) M for Cu(II) and 8 x 10(-9) M for Pd(II). (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据