4.7 Article

Electrochemical determination of methimazole based on the acetylene black/chitosan film electrode and its application to rat serum samples

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 81, 期 2, 页码 86-90

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2011.04.001

关键词

Acetylene black; Chitosan; Modified electrode; Methimazole; Voltammetry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070885]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method has been developed for the determination of methimazole, which was based on the enhanced electrochemical response of methimazole at the acetylene black/chitosan composite film modified glassy carbon electrode. The electrochemical behavior of methimazole was studied at this film electrode by cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry. The experimental results showed that methimazole exhibited a remarkable oxidation peak at 0.63 Vat the film electrode. Compared with the bare glassy carbon electrode, the oxidation peak current increased greatly, and the peak potential shifted negatively, which indicated that the acetylene black/chitosan film electrode had good catalysis to the electrochemical oxidation of methimazole. The enhanced oxidation current of methimazole was indebted to the nano-porus structure of the composite film and the enlarged effective electrode area. The influences of some experimental conditions on the oxidation of methimazole were tested and the calibration plot was examined. The results indicated that the differential pulse response of methimazole was linear with its concentration in the range of 1.0 x 10(-7) to 2.0 x 10(-5) mol/L with a linear coefficient of 0.998, and in the range of 4.0 x 10(-5) to 3.0 x 10(-4) mol/L with a linear coefficient of 0.993. The detection limit was 2.0 x 10(-8) mol/L (S/N = 3). The film electrode was used to detect the content of methimazole in rat serum samples by the standard addition method with satisfactory results. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据