4.8 Article

Neutrophil chemoattractant 2β regulates expression of the Reg gene in injured gastric mucosa in rats

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 119, 期 6, 页码 1610-1622

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2000.20262

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Regenerating (Reg) protein has a trophic effect on gastric mucosal cells. We have shown that Reg gene expression is increased in enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells during the healing of damaged gastric mucosa around mucosal erosion. This study was designed to explore the stimulants of Reg expression during the healing of gastric mucosal damage. Methods: Time course changes of the expression of genes for various proinflammatory cytokines and Reg were investigated after induction of gastric mucosal lesions in rats. The direct effect of proinflammatory cytokines on Reg gene expression and Reg protein production were investigated in vitro using counterflow elutriation-enriched rat ECL cells. CXC receptor 2 (CXCR-2) expression was investigated in ECL cells by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Reg gene expression was also investigated in rats treated by the neutralizing antibody of cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC-2 beta). Results: During healing, the gene expression of several proinflammatory cytokines and Reg was markedly augmented. Among the proinflammatory cytokines, CINC-2 beta is the only cytokine in which augmented expression preceded the increase of Reg gene expression. In rats treated with CINC-2 beta neutralizing antibody, the augmentation of Reg gene expression was significantly inhibited. When ECL cells were incubated with these proinflammatory cytokines, CINC-2 beta dose-dependently increased Reg messenger RNA and Reg protein in ECL cells. CXCR-2 was identified in isolated ECL cells. Conclusions: CINC-2 beta, expressed in damaged gastric mucosa, stimulates the production of Reg protein in ECL cells via CXCR-2 and may be involved in the accelerated healing of injured gastric mucosa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据