4.5 Article

Prognostic significance of arterial phase CT for prediction of response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective analysis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
卷 175, 期 6, 页码 1665-1672

出版社

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.6.1751665

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to use hepatic arterial phase helical CT to as sess tumor vascularity and predict the likelihood of response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Helical CT findings for 57 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were classified into one of three patterns of vascularity on the basis of the degree of tumor or liver enhancement during the hepatic arterial phase. Cases in which hypervascular lesions predominated were classified as a type 1 pattern. Cases in which hypovascular lesions predominated were classified as a type 2 pattern. Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders on the basis of the changes of tumor size revealed on CT after three transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatments. RESULTS. We classified the 57 patients as 37 responders (65%) and 20 nonresponders (35%). A statistically significant correlation between the type 1 hypervascular pattern and response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was seen; conversely, the type 2 hypovascular pattern correlated with nonresponse to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (chi-square = 7.85, p = 0.02). Patients classified as responders lived significantly longer than those classified as nonresponders with 12-, 24-, and 36-month survival rates of 90%, 67%, and 36%. respectively, for responders and 70%, 17%, and 10%, respectively, for nonresponders. CONCLUSION. We found that patients who responded to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization had prolonged survival (p < 0.01). Response correlated closely with tumor vascularity as shown on hepatic arterial phase helical CT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据