4.6 Article

Missing the target? A critical view on butterfly conservation efforts on calcareous grasslands in south-western Germany

期刊

BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 2223-2241

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-012-0413-0

关键词

Biodiversity loss; Community composition change; Global change; Habitat fragmentation; Circuitscape; Landscape resistance

资金

  1. Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation
  2. Ministry for Environment, Agriculture, Viticulture, Food and Forests Rhineland-Palatinate
  3. German Federal Environmental Foundation
  4. Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirektion Nord (Koblenz, Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Butterflies are strongly declining on grassland habitats of Central Europe. Therefore, the success of conservation measures on high quality grassland habitats is controversially discussed. We compared the changes in butterfly diversity and community structure on six managed calcareous grasslands with eight unmanaged vineyard fallows. We obtained strong losses of species diversity and remarkable shifts of community compositions on both habitat types. However, the changes on vineyard fallows were only slightly more severe but more stochastic than on the calcareous grasslands. The shifts in community composition with respect to functional species traits were rather similar between the two different grassland types so that complex butterfly communities evolved into generalist-dominated ones. Connectivity was higher among vineyard fallows than among calcareous grasslands. Consequently, conservation measures on calcareous grasslands only partly achieved their goal to maintain the high species diversity and functional complexity still observed in the 1970s. The negative impacts of eutrophication and monotonisation of the landscape as well as climate change are affecting all habitats, independently from management concepts. Therefore, management on conservation sites can buffer against these effects, but is not sufficient for a full compensation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据