4.2 Review

Memory for labor pain: A review of the literature

期刊

BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 244-253

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00244.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Women's ability and accuracy in recalling labor pain are widely debated, even though clinicians commonly use such retrospective information in their practice. The objectives of this paper are to review the literature to establish if labor pain is forgotten, if recall is accurate, factors that affect the accuracy of recall, and consequences of recall. Methods: All electronic search of Medscape, Pspchlit, Bath Information and Data Services, and CINAHL between 1990 and 1999 was undertaken using the key words labor and labour, pain, and memory. Each key word produced thousands of hits, but the combination of ail three was surprisingly' unsuccessful. This review: therefore, used a manual and print search and ct detailed knowledge of work in this mid related fields. Results: The literature was relatively limited and many studies demonstrated methodological problems. Inductive and deductive analysis suggested that women do not completed forget labor pain, and recall is often vivid but not always entirely accuracy. Conclusions: Memories of labor pain can evoke intense negative reactions in a few women, but are more likely to give rise to positive consequences related to coping, self-efficacy and self-esteem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据