4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

A physical scaling relation between the size of an earthquake and its nucleation zone size

期刊

PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
卷 157, 期 11-12, 页码 2259-2282

出版社

BIRKHAUSER VERLAG AG
DOI: 10.1007/PL00001084

关键词

earthquake nucleation; inhomogeneous fault; high rupture growth resistance; a slip-dependent constitutive law

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A specific model of the earthquake nucleation that proceeds on a non-uniform fault is put forward to explain seismological data on the nucleation in terms of the underlying physics. The model is compatible with Gutenberg-Richter's similarity law for earthquake frequency-magnitude relation. A theoretical approach in the framework of fracture mechanics, based on a laboratory-based slip-dependent constitutive law, leads to the conclusion that the earthquake moment M-o, scales with the third power of the critical slip displacement D-c and the critical size 2L(c) (L-c, half-length) of the nucleation zone. This scaling relation quantitatively explains seismological data published, and it predicts that 2L, is of the order of 10 km for earthquakes with M-o = 10(21) Nm, 1 km for earthquakes with M-o = 10(18) Nm, and 10 km for earthquakes with M-o = 10(15) Nm, under the assumption that the breakdown stress drop Delta tau (b) = 10 MPa. However, L-c, depends on not only D-c, but also Delta tau (b), so that the scaling relation between L-c and D-c, may be violated by Delta tau (b) because Delta tau (b) potentially takes any value in a wide range from 1 to 10(2) MPa, depending on the seismogenic environment. The good agreement between the theoretical relation and observed results suggests that a large earthquake may result from the failure of a large patch of high rupture growth resistance, whereas a small earthquake may result from the breakdown of a small patch of high rupture growth resistance. The present result encourages one to pursue the prediction capability for large earthquakes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据