4.6 Article

Benzodiazepines with different half-life and falling in a hospitalized population: the GIFA study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 53, 期 12, 页码 1222-1229

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00254-7

关键词

benzodiazepines; different half-life; risk factor; fall; hospitalized elderly population pharmacoepidemiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

in recent years, the use of benzodiazepines has been recognized as an independent risk factor for fairs among the elderly. To evaluate the role of different types of benzodiazepines in determining falls in a hospitalized geriatric population, we conducted a prospective study among 7908 patients consecutively admitted in 58 clinical centers of the Gruppo Italiano di Farmacovigilanza nell'Anziano (GIFA), during an 8-month observation period (1991 and 1993). Over 70% of the patients were older than 65 years, 50% were women, and 23.6% had a benzodiazepine prescription during hospital stay. The number of patients who experienced one or more falls during follow-up was 174 (2.2%) Sixty falls occurred among patients taking benzodiazepines (3.2%) and 114 (1.9%) among those who did not use benzodiazepines; the crude odds ratio for users versus non-users was 1.7 (95% CI 1.2-2.3). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that benzodiazepines with very short (OR 1.9; CI 1.03-3.3) and short half-life (OR 1.8; CI 1.2-2.8) were positively associated with fails during hospital stay. Patients who used other psychotropic agents (OR 2.3; CI 1.7-3.4). antidiabetic agents (OR 1.5; CI 1.03-2.2), patients with presence of cognitive impairment (OR 1.6; CI 1.08-2.3), high level of comorbidity (OR 1.7; CI 1.05-2.9), more advanced age (>80 years, OR 2.7, CI 1.5-4.7) and those who stayed in the hospital for 17 days or more (OR 2.1; CI 1.4-3.3) were also at a greater risk. These findings suggest that benzodiazepines with short and very short half-life are an important and independent risk factor for falls and their prescription to elderly hospitalized patients should be carefully evaluated. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights resented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据