4.3 Article

Catecholamine levels and receptor expression in row protein rat offspring

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 848-853

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00392.x

关键词

adrenaline; adrenoceptors; diabetes mellitus; low protein diet; noradrenaline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Low birthweight in humans has been shown to lead to increased resting pulse rate in adult life, suggesting possible increased sympathoadrenal activity. The hypothesis that early growth restriction is associated with permanent alterations in catecholamine metabolism was tested. Methods Circulating catecholamine concentrations (by radioimmunoassay) and adipocyte adrenoceptor expression from different fat depots (by Western blot) were estimated in 12-week-old male offspring of rat dams fed a reduced protein diet during pregnancy and lactation. Results In the fed state, median (interquartile range) plasma adrenaline concentrations for male control and low protein offspring rats were: 0.65 (0.48-0.86) vs. 1.42 (0.89-1.87) nmol/l (P < 0.005), respectively. Equivalent noradrenaline concentrations were: 2.71 (2.16-3.46) vs. 3.45 (3.00-4.28) nmol/l (P < 0.05). After 24 h starvation, plasma adrenaline concentrations of controls rose to become similar to those of low protein offspring: 1.03 (0.95-1.31) vs. 1.41 (0.69-1.62) nmol/1 (P = 0.3), respectively. Noradrenaline concentrations rose in both groups to become similar: 3.84 (3.33-4.54) vs. 4.32 (3.70-6.54) nmol/1 (P = 0.3). In epididymal adipocytes adrenoceptor expression (relative to that of controls) was: alpha (2A) 0.79 (0.66-0.94) (P = 0.08), beta (1) 2.60 (2.27-3.07) (P = 0.04), beta (3) 1.37 (1.27-1.46) (P = 0.02). Similar-pattern differences in adrenoceptor expression were observed in subcutaneous and intra-abdominal adipocytes. Conclusions These results are consistent with the suggestion that long-term alterations in catecholamine metabolism are present in adult offspring of rats fed a reduced protein diet during pregnancy and lactation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据