4.6 Article

Mapping of the region of complement receptor (CR) 1 required for Plasmodium falciparum resetting and demonstration of the importance of CR1 in resetting in field isolates

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 165, 期 11, 页码 6341-6346

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.11.6341

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI RO1-42367] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum induces a number of novel adhesion properties in the erythrocytes that it infects. One of these properties, the ability of infected erythrocytes to bind uninfected erythrocytes to form rosettes, is associated with severe malaria and may play a direct role in the pathogenesis of disease. Previous work has shown that erythrocytes deficient in complement receptor (CR) 1 (CR1, CD35; C3b/C4b receptor) have greatly reduced resetting capacity, indicating an essential role for CR1 in rosette formation. Using deletion mutants and mAbs, we have localized the region of CR1 required for the formation of P. falciparum rosettes to the area of long homologous repeat regions B and C that also acts as the binding site for the activated complement component C3b, This result raises the possibility that C3b could be an intermediary in resetting, bridging between the infected erythrocyte and CR1. We were able to exclude this hypothesis, however, as parasites grown in C3-deficient human serum formed rosettes normally. We have also shown in this report that rosettes can be reversed by mAb J3B11 that recognizes the C3b binding site of CR1. This rosette-reversing activity was demonstrated in a range of laboratory-adapted parasite strains and field isolates from Kenya and Malawi, Thus, we have mapped the region of CR1 required for resetting and demonstrated that the CR1 dependent resetting mechanism occurs commonly in P, falciparum isolates, and could therefore be a potential target for future therapeutic interventions to treat severe malaria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据