4.6 Article

Quantification of upper motor neuron loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 12, 页码 2208-2218

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00481-8

关键词

transcranial magnetic stimulation; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; upper motor neuron; triple stimulation technique; collision technique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To quantitatively estimate upper motor neuron (UMN) loss in ALS. Methods: We used the recently developed triple stimulation technique (TST) to study corticospinal conduction to 86 abductor digiti minimi muscles of 48 ALS patients. This method employs a collision technique to estimate the proportion of motor units activated by a transcranial magnetic stimulus. At the same time, it yields an estimate of lower motor neuron (LMN) integrity. Results: The TST disclosed and quantified central conduction failures attributable to UMN loss in 38 sides of 24 patients (subclinical in 15 sides), whereas conventional motor evoked potentials detected abnormalities in only 18 sides of 12 patients (subclinical in two sides). The increased sensitivity of the TST to detect UMN dysfunction was particularly observed in early cases. Increased central motor conduction times (CMCT) occurred exclusively in sides with conduction failure. In sides with clinical UMN syndromes, the TST response size (but not the CMCT) correlated with the muscle weakness. In sides with clinical LMN syndromes, the size of the peripherally evoked compound muscle action potentials correlated with the muscle weakness. Conclusion: The TST is a sensitive method to detect UMN dysfunction in ALS. It allows a quantitative estimate of the UMN loss, which is related to the functional deficit. Therefore, the TST has a considerable impact on diagnostic certainty in many patients. It will be suited to follow the disease progression and therapeutic trials. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据