4.6 Article

Phase separation over an extended compositional range:: Studies of the Ca1-xBixMnO3 (x≤0.25) phase diagram

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 62, 期 22, 页码 14928-14942

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.14928

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase transitions on the electron-doped side of the Ca1-xBixMnO3 system (x less than or equal to0.25) have been investigated using high-resolution synchrotron x-ray and neutron powder-diffraction techniques,(-)electrical transport and magnetic susceptibility measurements. At room temperature all samples investigated were single phase, paramagnetic conductors (p<0.1 cm), isostructural with GdFeO3 (space group Pnma). The Mn-O-Mn angles remain nearly constant from x=0 to x=0.25, while the Mn-O distances steadily increase with the Mn3+ content. Three distinct phases are observed at 25 K. The first one, observed from 0.15 greater than or equal to x greater than or equal to0.03, is characterized by the absence of charge and orbital ordering, a canted G-type antiferromagnetic spin structure, and delocalized electron transport. The second phase, observed from 0.25 greater than or equal tox greater than or equal to0.12 (single phase at x= 0.18), is characterized by pronounced orbital ordering, a C-type antiferromagnetic spin structure, and insulating behavior. The third low-temperature phase, observed for x greater than or equal to 0.20, is characterized by orbital and magnetic ordering similar to the Wigner crystal structure previously observed for Ca0.67La0.33MnO3, but with a 4a x b x 2c unit cell. The most striking feature of the phase diagram is the wide compositional range over which low-temperature phase separation is observed. Only those samples with x<0.12 and x = 0.18 did not undergo phase separation upon cooling. We show that this behavior cannot be attributed to compositional variations, and therefore, propose that anisotropic strain interactions between crystallites may be partially responsible for this behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据