4.4 Article

Efficacy of bacterial consortium-AIE2 for contemporaneous Cr(VI) and azo dye bioremediation in batch and continuous bioreactor systems, monitoring steady-state bacterial dynamics using qPCR assays

期刊

BIODEGRADATION
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 813-826

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10532-009-9269-8

关键词

Bacterial consortium; Biodegradation; Azo dye; Cr(VI); Real-time PCR; FTIR

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  2. Australian Government Department of Education Science and Training (DEST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial consortium-AIE2 with a capability of contemporaneous Cr(VI) reduction and azo dye RV5 decolourization was developed from industrial wastewaters by enrichment culture technique. The 16S rRNA gene based molecular analyses revealed that the consortium bacterial community structure consisted of four bacterial strains namely, Alcaligenes sp. DMA, Bacillus sp. DMB, Stenotrophomonas sp. DMS and Enterococcus sp. DME. Cumulative mechanism of Cr(VI) reduction by the consortium was determined using in vitro Cr(VI) reduction assays. Similarly, the complete degradation of Reactive Violet 5 (RV5) dye was confirmed by FTIR spectroscopic analysis. Consortium-AIE2 exhibited simultaneous bioremediation efficiencies of (97.8 +/- A 1.4) % and (74.1 +/- A 1.2) % in treatment of both 50 mg l(-1) Cr(VI) and RV5 dye concentrations within 48 h of incubation at pH 7 and 37A degrees C in batch systems. Continuous bioreactor systems achieved simultaneous bioremediation efficiencies of (98.4 +/- A 1.5) % and (97.5 +/- A 1.4) % after the onset of steady-state at 50 mg l(-1) input Cr(VI) and 25 mg l(-1) input RV5 concentrations, respectively, at medium dilution rate (D) of 0.014 h(-1). The 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in the continuous bioreactor as determined by real-time PCR assay indicated that Alcaligenes sp. DMA and Bacillus sp. DMB dominated consortium bacterial community during the active continuous bioremediation process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据