4.0 Article

Tidal circulation and buoyancy effects in the St. Lawrence Estuary

期刊

ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 505-556

出版社

CANADIAN METEOROLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHIC SOC
DOI: 10.1080/07055900.2000.9649658

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The action of tides on density-driven circulation, internal gravity waves, and mixing was investigated in the St. Lawrence Estuary between Rimouski and Quebec City. Time-varying fields of water level, currents and density were computed under typical summer conditions using a three-dimensional hydrostatic coastal ocean model that incorporates a second order turbulence closure submodel. These results are compared with current meter records and other observations The model and the observations reveal buoyancy effects produced by tidal forcing. The semi-diurnal tide raises the isopycnals over the sills at the head of the Laurentian Trough and English Bank, producing internal tides radiating seaward. Relatively dense intermediate waters rise from below 75-m depth to the near surface over the sills setting rip gravity currents on the inner slopes. Internal hydraulic controls develop over the outer sills; during flood, surface flow separation occurs at the entrances of the Saguenay Fjord and the upper estuary west of Ilet Rouge Bank. Early during ebb flow (restratification), the surface layer. deepens to encompass the tops of the sills. As the ebb current intensifies, the model predicts the formation of seaward internal jumps over the outer sills, which were confirmed from acoustic reflection observations. As the internal Froude number increases further; flow separation migrates up to sill height As a result of these transitions internal bores emanate from the head region one to two hours before low water We find that the mixing of oceanic and surface,waters near the sills is driven by the vertical shear produced during ebb in the channel south of Ilet Rouge, the shear produced in the bottom gravity flood currents, and, to a lesser extent the processes over the sills.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据