4.7 Article

Deriving water content of chaparral vegetation from AVIRIS data

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 74, 期 3, 页码 570-581

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00147-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spectral imaging data acquired with Advanced Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer over Point Dume (Los Angeles County, CA, USA) were used to assess the ability of hyperspectral reflectance data to estimate canopy Relative Water Content (RWC) at the landscape level. The study was performed on 23 vegetation stands comprised of three characteristic chaparral plant communities, with contrasting phenological stages and canopy cover. Several estimates of water content based on the near-infra-red (SWIR) water absorption bands were compared to measurements of vegetation structure and water content made on the ground. The Water Index (WI) and Normalized Difference Water index (NDWI), reflectance indices formulated from the NIR water absorption bands, were the best indicators of canopy RWC estimated from combining leaf relative water content with measures of canopy structure. A stepwise multiple regression revealed that canopy structure explained 36% and 41% of the variation in WI and NDWI, respectively. The explained variance in WI and NDWI increased to 44% and 48% when leaf relative water content was included in the model. By contrast, the inclusion of leaf relative water content did not contribute significantly to the explained variance in indices formulated using SWIR water absorption bands and in those based on water thickness. The relationship between WI and the canopy RWC significantly improved when only data from plots with green vegetation cover >70% were considered (r(2)=0.88, p<0.001). All the indices studied had an important structural component (as indicated by the strong correlation with NDVI), yet only the indices WI and NDWI additionally responded to water content. These results indicate that the WI and NDWI are sensitive to variations in canopy relative water content at the landscape scale. (C) Elsevier Science Inc., 2000.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据