4.6 Article

Chemokine receptor 1 knockout abrogates natural killer cell recruitment and impairs type-1 cytokines in lymphoid tissue during pulmonary granuloma formation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 157, 期 6, 页码 2055-2063

出版社

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64844-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL052773, HL52773, HL56306] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R56 AI043460, R01 AI043460, AI43460, R03 AI055270] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mice with targeted mutation of chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) were used to assess the contribution of CCR1 agonists to local, regional, and systemic inflammatory-related events during experimental pulmonary granuloma formation. Models of Th1 (type-1) and Th2 (type-2) cell-mediated. lung granulomas were induced in wild-type (CCR+/+) and knockout (CCR1-/-) mice by embolizing Sepharose beads coupled to the purified protein derivative of Mycobacterium bovis or soluble antigens derived, from Schistosoma mansoni eggs. Morphometric analysis indicated that granuloma sizes were unchanged in CCR1-/- mice, but now cytometric analyses of dispersed granulomas revealed that natural killer cell recruitment to type-1 lesions was abrogated by 60%. Analysis of cytokine production by draining lymph node cultures showed altered expression in CCR1-/- mice characterized by reduced interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma in the type-1 response, and enhanced interleukin-5 and interleukin-13 in the type-2 response. Peripheral blood leukocytosis was also enhanced in the type-1 but not the type-2 response. These findings suggest that CCR1 agonists contribute to multiple immunoinflammatory events in the type-1 granulomatous response with natural killer cell accumulation being particularly sensitive to CCR1 disruption. Although functional efficacy of granulomas may be altered, chemokine redundancy and cytokine reserve seem to make the bulk of the exudative response resistant to CCR1 disruption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据