4.1 Article

Effects of dexamethasone on development of immunoglobulin G subclass responses following vaccination of horses

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 12, 页码 1530-1533

出版社

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.1530

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-To determine the effects of dexamethasone on development of IgG subclass responses following vaccination of healthy horses. Animals-11 mature Thoroughbreds. Procedure-Horses received 2 IM injections at 2-week intervals of a vaccine containing inactivated infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, bovine viral diarrhea, and parainfluenza-3 viral antigens and were then randomly assigned to 2 groups. Six horses received dexamethasone (0.2 mg/kg of body weight, IM) twice weekly for 8 weeks starting the day of the first vaccination. Five control horses received an equivalent volume of saline 10.9% NaCl) solution. Antigen-specific serum IgG subclass liters were determined weekly after vaccination by use of an ELISA. Results-Vaccination resulted in similar antigen-specific serum IgG(T) liters in dexamethasone-treated and control horses. In contrast, although control horses developed IgGa and IgGb responses after vaccination, corticosteroid administration completely inhibited these responses in treated horses. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Cortico steroids can have profound effects on primary immune responses in horses and can significantly affect IgG responses to inactivated vaccines. Corticosteroid treatment regimens commonly used to treat diseases in horses may result induction of a nonprotective IgG subclass response, leaving treated horses susceptible to disease. Additionally, mechanisms regulating IgGa and IgGb responses appear to differ from those regulating IgG(T) responses. Further defining these mechanisms is a critical step in designing effective vaccines, and corticosteroid-induced immunomodulation may be a valuable tool for studying immune responses in horses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据