4.5 Article

Immunohistochemical analysis of CCR2, CCR3, CCR5, and CXCP4 in the human brain: Potential mechanisms for HIV dementia

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY
卷 69, 期 3, 页码 192-201

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/exmp.2000.2336

关键词

CXCR4; CCR2; CCR3; CCR5; central nervous system (CNS); chemokine receptor; HIV-1; HIV-related dementia

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH58958] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-27405] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CXC chemokine receptor CXCR4 was the first molecule identified as a coreceptor working in conjunction with CD4 to mediate cellular entry for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-I). Since that original discovery, 11 other seven-mtransmembrane domain molecules, many of which are chemokine receptors, have been shown to facilitate HIV entry into cells. These include CCR5, CCR3, CCR2, CCR1, CCR8, CX3CR1, STRL33 (BONZO), GPR15 (BOB), GPR1, US28, and APJ. In studies done by this and other labs, CCR3, CCR5, and CXCR4 have been identified in CNS microglia and several laboratories, including ours, have shown that CXCR4 is expressed in neurons. Neuronal expression of CCR2, CCR3, and CCR5 has been less consistent. We performed a semiquantitative immunohistochemical analysis of the expression of CCR2, CCR3, CCR5, and CXCR4 in 23 regions of the brain and in two sections of the spinal cord. Hippocampal neurons were positive for CCR2, CCR3, and CXCR4, but not for CCR5. In other regions of the brain, neurons, and glial cells reacted with anti-CCR2, anti-CCR3, and anti-CXCR4 antibodies, whereas only glial cells (primarily microglia) were positive for CCR5. The areas of highest expression, however, seem to be subcortical regions and the limbic system. The limbic system plays a key role in memory, and the presence of CXCR4 - which can bind the viral envelope protein gpl20-min a subset of neurons from this system may play a role in the development of HIV-related dementia. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据