4.4 Article

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas: indications for postoperative radiotherapy

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 713-717

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.01153.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To determine the indications for postoperative radiotherapy after surgical resection of a nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma. METHODS A retrospective chart review of 72 patients with histologically proven chromophobe adenoma who presented for pituitary surgery between January 1985 and June 1998, with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The study endpoint was tumour recurrence or progression detected either by routine follow-up imaging or by clinical progression with subsequent confirmation by imaging. A proportional hazards model was used to determine independent prognostic factors. RESULTS Mean follow-up was 64 months. In the radiotherapy group 13 of 50 recurred (or progressed) (26%), while in the nonradiotherapy group 10 of 22 recurred (46%), logrank test, P = 0.025. In patients assessed as having complete excision of tumour (n = 20) only two recurred (10%), both in patients without radiotherapy. No further treatment has been required in either case to date. In patients with residual tumour (n = 52), 41 had radiotherapy with 13 recurrences (32%), while 11 patients had no radiotherapy with eight subsequent recurrences (73%); logrank test, P = 0.007. Further treatment has been required in the majority of these cases, Cox's proportional hazards model analysis showed that only complete tumour removal and postoperative radiotherapy were independent favourable prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS The goal of surgery should be complete surgical excision where possible. The risk of recurrence in patients with no residual tumour on postoperative imaging is low enough to justify withholding routine postoperative radiotherapy in this group. In patients with residual tumour, conventional external beam radiotherapy administered within 12 months of surgery is effective at reducing recurrence or progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据