4.7 Article

Inducing Cancer Cell Death by Targeting Its Nucleus: Solid Gold Nanospheres versus Hollow Gold Nanocages

期刊

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 897-906

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bc300592d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health-National Cancer Institute [U01CA151802-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, we have shown that targeting the cancer cell nucleus with solid gold nanospheres, using a cancer cell penetrating/pro-apoptotic peptide (RGD) and a nuclear localization sequence peptide (NLS), inhibits cell division, thus leading to apoptosis. In the present work, flow cytometric analysis revealed an increase in cell death, via apoptosis and necrosis, in HSC cells upon treatment with peptide-conjugated hollow gold nanocages, compared to those treated with the peptide-conjugated solid gold nanospheres. This is consistent with a G0/G1 phase accumulation, S phase depletion, and G2/M phase depletion, as well as reduced ATP levels. Here, we investigate the possible causes for the observed enhanced cell death with the use of confocal microscopy. The fluorescence images of HSC cells treated with gold nanocages indicate the presence of reactive oxygen species, known to cause apoptosis. The formation of reactive oxygen species observed is consistent with a mechanism involving the oxidation of metallic silver on the inner cavity of the nanocage (inherent to the synthesis of the gold nanocages) to silver oxide. This oxidation is confirmed by an observed redshift in the surface plasmon resonance of the gold nanocages in cell culture medium. The silver oxide, a semiconductor known to photochemically generate hydroxyl radicals, a form of reactive oxygen species, is proposed as a mechanism for the enhanced cell death caused by gold nanocages. Thus, the enhanced cell death, via apoptosis and necrosis, observed with peptide-conjugated hollow gold nanocage-treated cells is considered to be a result of the metallic composition (silver remaining on the inner cavity) of the nanocage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据