4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Changes in cognitive functioning following treatment of late-life depression

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 157, 期 12, 页码 1949-1954

出版社

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PRESS, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.12.1949

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-05133] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-52247, MH-01684] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Knowledge of the relationship between various clinical characteristics and cognitive functioning is advancing, but little is known about the cognitive response to treatment for geriatric depression. The purpose of this study was to examine the cognitive response to treatment for patients with late-life depression. Method: Subjects included 45 nondemented, elderly depressed patients who achieved remission after 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment and 20 elderly comparison subjects. All subjects were administered a battery of clinical measures, including cognitive screening instruments, before and after treatment. Results: As a group, the elderly depressed patients showed a small improvement in overall cognitive functioning after treatment. Among depressed patients with concomitant cognitive impairment at baseline, performance on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale domains of conceptualization and initiation/perseveration improved significantly relative to those of depressed patients with normal cognition. Despite the improvement following treatment, the overall level of cognitive functioning in the elderly depressed patients with cognitive impairment at baseline remained mildly impaired, especially in the memory and initiation/perseveration domains. Conclusions: Elderly depressed patients with cognitive impairment may experience improvement in specific domains following antidepressant treatment but may not necessarily reach normal levels of performance, particularly in memory and executive functions. This subgroup of late-life depression patients is likely at high risk of developing progressive dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据