4.7 Review

64Cu-Labeled Phosphonium Cations as PET Radiotracers for Tumor Imaging

期刊

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 1459-1472

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bc200106p

关键词

-

资金

  1. Purdue University
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R01 CA115883]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alteration in mitochondrial transmembrane potential (Delta Psi(m)) is an important characteristic of cancer. The observation that the enhanced negative mitochondrial potential is prevalent in tumor cell phenotype provides a conceptual basis for development of mitochondrion-targeting therapeutic drugs and molecular imaging probes. Since plasma and Mitochondrial potentials are negative, many delocalized organic cations, such as rhodamine-123 and H-3-tetraphenylphosphonium, are electrophoretically driven through these membranes, and able to localize in the energized mitochondria of tumor cells. Cationic radiotracers, such as Tc-99m-Sestamibi and Tc-99m-Tetrofosmin, have been clinically used for diagnosis of cancer by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and noninvasive monitoring of the multidrug resistance (MDR) transport function in tumors of different origin. However, their diagnostic and prognostic values are often limited due to their insufficient tumor localization (low radiotracer tumor uptake) and high radioactivity accumulation in the chest and abdominal regions (low tumor selectivity). In contrast, the Cu-64-labeled phosphonium cations represent a new class of PET (positron emission tomography) radiotracers with good tumor uptake and high tumor selectivity. This review article will focus on our recent experiences in evaluation of Cu-64-labeled phosphonium cations as potential PET radiotracers. The main objective is to illustrate the impact of radiometal chelate on physical, chemical, and biological properties of Cu-64 radiotracers. It will also discuss some important issues related to their tumor selectivity and possible tumor localization mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据