4.7 Article

Short-term natural weathering of MSWI bottom ash

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 287-299

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00270-3

关键词

MSWI; bottom ash; weathering; ageing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The release of heavy metals from MSWI bottom ash has been the key concern in the management of this material. The leaching distribution values obtained from 100 freshly quenched bottom ash samples, according to the German DIN 38414-S4 procedure test, showed the release of lead, zinc and copper to be the main hazards associated with bottom ash utilisation as a secondary building material. Currently, natural weathering of MSWI bottom ash, for an estimated period of 1-3 months, is the most economic treatment available to ensure the eventual utilisation of this material. The leaching of natural weathered bottom ash in the short-term (up to 9 months) was studied. The most significant changes in the bottom ash were found to occur in the first 90 days. At pH values greater than 12, lead, zinc and copper were the main heavy metals to be released from the MSWI freshly quenched bottom ash samples studied. Natural weathering for a period of about 90 days reduced the leaching of heavy metals, stabilising the bottom ash pH to minimise the solubility of metal hydroxides, and enabled the residue to be used as secondary building material. The profile of the pH neutralisation curve is similar to that described by carbonates, which would suggest that the reaction is controlled by CO(2). The formation of insoluble oxides as well as carbonates control the immobilisation of certain heavy metals, e.g. lead and zinc. The leaching of aluminium increases during this short natural weathering stage due to elemental metal oxidation, Aluminium solubility is controlled by the precipitation of gibbsite or other aluminium-sulphate neoformations. The latter may contribute to the immobilisation of heavy metals. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据