4.6 Article

Endotoxin activation of macrophages does not induce ATP release and autocrine stimulation of P2 nucleotide receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 165, 期 12, 页码 7189-7198

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.12.7189

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL07415] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM36387] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Receptors for extracellular nucleotides (P2, or purinergic receptors) have previously been implicated in the transduction of endotoxin signaling in macrophages, The most compelling evidence has been the observation that inhibitors of ionotropic nucleotide (P2X) receptors, including periodate-oxidized ATP (oATP), attenuate a subset of endotoxin-induced effects such as activation of NF-kappaB and up-regulation of inducible NO synthase, We investigated whether endotoxin induces ATP release from a murine macrophage cell line (BAC1.2F5) using sensitive on-line assays for extracellular ATP. These cells constitutively released ATP, producing steady-state extracellular concentrations of similar to1 nM when assayed as monolayers of 10(6) adherent cells bathed in 1 ml of medium. However, the macrophages did not release additional ATP during either acute or prolonged endotoxin stimulation. In addition, cellular ecto-ATPase activities were measured following prolonged endotoxin activation and were found not to be significantly altered. Although oATP treatment significantly attenuated the endotoxin-induced production of NO, this inhibitory effect was not reproduced when the cells were coincubated with apyrase, a highly effective ATP scavenger. These results indicate that activation of macrophages by endotoxin does not induce autocrine stimulation of P2 nucleotide receptors by endogenous ATP released to extracellular compartments. Moreover, the data suggest that the ability of oATP to interfere with endotoxin signaling is due to its interaction with molecular species other than ATP-binding P2 receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据