4.7 Article

Mutation of a Drosophila gamma tubulin ring complex subunit encoded by discs degenerate-4 differentially disrupts centrosomal protein localization

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 14, 期 24, 页码 3126-3139

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.182800

关键词

gamma-TuRC; centrosomes; centrioles; mitosis; spindle; microtubules

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have cloned the Drosophila gene discs degenerate-4 (dd4) and find that it encodes a component of the gamma -tubulin ring complex (gamma TuRC) homologous to Spc98 of budding yeast. This provides the first opportunity to study decreased function of a member of the gamma -tubulin ring complex, other than gamma -tubulin itself, in a metazoan cell. gamma -tubulin is no longer at the centrosomes but is dispersed throughout dd4 cells and yet bipolar metaphase spindles do form, although these have a dramatically decreased density of microtubules. Centrosomin (CNN) remains in broad discrete bodies but only at the focused poles of such spindles, whereas Asp ((a) under bar bnormaI (s) under bar pindle (p) under bar rotein) is always present at the presumptive minus ends of microtubules, whether or not they are focused. This is consistent with the proposed role of Asp in coordinating the nucleation of mitotic microtubule organizing centers. The centrosome associated protein CP190 is partially lost from the spindle poles in dd4 cells supporting a weak interaction with gamma -tubulin, and the displaced protein accumulates in the vicinity of chromosomes. Electron microscopy indicates not only that the poles of dd4 cells have irregular amounts of pericentriolar material, but also that they can have abnormal centrioles. In six dd4 cells subjected to serial sectioning centrioles were missing from one of the two poles. This suggests that in addition to its role in nucleating cytoplasmic and spindle microtubules, the gamma TuRC is also essential to the structure of centrioles and the separation of centrosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据