4.7 Article

Pulsatile drug release from poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres:: how does the composition of the polymer matrices affect the time interval between the initial burst and the pulsatile release of drugs?

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 173-179

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0927-7765(00)00148-X

关键词

pulsatile release; poly (lactide-co-glycolide); microsphere; biodegradable polymer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulsatile release of estradiol was observed from poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres, of which the monomer composition was 75% lactide and 25% glycolide. Estradiol was monolithically dissolved in the polymer matrices. The microspheres were immersed in a pH 7.4 phosphate buffer saline at 37 degrees C. When estradiol was loaded in microspheres consisting of poly (lactide-co-glycolide) of average molecular weight ((M) over bar w) of 74 000 before degradation, the pulse of estradiol release was observed almost 50 days after the initial burst. On the other hand, if poly (lactide-co-glycolide) of (M) over bar w 44 000 before degradation was used as a material to prepare the microspheres, then estradiol was released in a pulsatile manner almost 20 days after the initial burst effect. It was found that the time interval between the initial burst and the pulsatile release can be regulated by mixing the above two types of poly (lactide-co-glycolide) with different (M) over bar w to prepare microspheres. For example, the pulsatile release of estradiol was observed 30 days after the degradation starts when the microspheres were composed of 50% poly (lactide-co-glycolide) of (M) over bar w 74 000 and 50% poly (lactide-co-glycolide) of (M) over bar w 44 000. In another case where the microspheres were composed of 75% poly (lactide-co-glycolide) of (M) over bar w 74 000 and 25% poly (lactide-co-glycolide) of (M) over bar W 44 000, the pulsatile release was observed 38 days after the degradation starts. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据