4.7 Article

Multiphoton-Absorption-Induced-Luminescence (MAIL) Imaging of Tumor-Targeted Gold Nanoparticles

期刊

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 11, 页码 1968-1977

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bc100115m

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF-NIRT [CHE 0511219478]
  2. Fischell Fellowship in Biomedical Engineering
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0835342] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate that multiphoton-absorption-induced luminescence (MAIL) is an effective means of monitoring the uptake of targeted nanoparticles into cells. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with diameters of 4.5 and 16 nm were surface-functionalized with monocyclic RGDfK, an RGD peptide analogue that specifically targets the alpha(v)beta(3) integrin, a membrane protein that is highly overexpressed in activated endothelial cells during tumor angiogenesis. To determine whether cyclic RGD can enhance the uptake of the functionalized AuNPs into activated endothelium, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were used as a model system. MAIL imaging of HUVECs incubated with AuNPs demonstrates differential uptake of AuNPs functionalized with RGD analogues: RGDfK-modified nanoparticles are taken up by the HUVECs preferentially compared to AuNPs modified with linear RGD (GRGDSP) conjugates or with no surface conjugates. The luminescence counts observed for the AuNP-RGDfK conjugates are an order of magnitude greater than for AuNP-GRGDSP conjugates. Transmission electron microscopy shows that, once internalized, the AuNP-RGDfK conjugates remain primarily within endosomal and lysosomal vesicles in the cytoplasm of the cells. Significant aggregation of these particles was observed within the cells. MAIL imaging studies in the presence of specific uptake inhibitors indicate that AuNP-RGDfK conjugate uptake involves a specific binding event, with alpha(v)beta(3) integrin-mediated endocytosis being an important uptake mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据