4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Alzheimer's disease: a dysfunction of the amyloid precursor protein

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 886, 期 1-2, 页码 54-66

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02869-9

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid precursor protein; neuronal death

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG12954] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this review, we argue that at least one insult that causes Alzheimer's disease (AD) is disruption of the normal function of the amyloid precursor protein (APP). Familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD) mutations in APP cause a disease phenotype that is identical (with the exception that they cause an earlier onset of the disease) to that of 'sporadic' AD. This suggests that there are molecular pathways common to FAD and sporadic AD. In addition, all individuals with Down syndrome, who carry an extra copy of chromosome 21 and overexpress APP several-fold in the brain. develop the pathology of AD if they live past the age of 40. These data support the primacy of APP in the disease. Although APP is the source of the beta -amyloid (A beta) that is deposited in amyloid plaques in AD brain, the primacy of APP in AD may not lie in the production of A beta from this molecule. We suggest instead that APP normally functions in the brain as a cell surface signaling molecule, and that a disruption of this normal function of APP is at least one cause of the neurodegeneration and consequent dementia in AD. We hypothesize in addition that disruption of the normal signaling function of APP causes cell cycle abnormalities in the neuron, and that these abnormalities constitute one mechanism of neuronal death in AD. Data supporting these hypotheses have come from investigations of the molecular consequences of neuronal expression of FAD mutants of APP or overexpression of wild type APP. as well as from identification of binding proteins for the carboxyl-terminus (C-terminus) of APP. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据