4.6 Article

Cholesterol in the year 2000

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-1981(00)00133-5

关键词

cholesterol; Konrad Bloch; sterol regulatory element binding protein; cholesterol biosynthesis; atherosclerosis; evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cholesterol research was one of the key areas of scientific investigation in the 20th century. Little was known about the structure of cholesterol until the pioneering research of A. Windaus and H. Wieland in the first part of the century. The structure of cholesterol was completely elucidated in 1932. With the development of isotopic tracers in the 1930s studies on cholesterol biosynthesis were initiated. In 1942 K. Bloch and D. Rittenberg showed that deuterium-labeled acetate was incorporated into the ring structure and side chain of cholesterol. Another important discovery from Bloch's laboratory was that squalene was a precursor of cholesterol. In 1956, the main elements of the biosynthetic pathway became known when isopentenyl pyrophosphate was discovered as a precursor. In 1966, J. Cornforth and G. Popjak predicted that there were 16 234 possible stereochemical pathways by which mevalonate could be converted into squalene. They subsequently showed which of these pathways was correct. In the 1970s and 1980s K. Bloch was able to provide intriguing evidence for an evolutionary advantage of cholesterol over lanosterol or some of the intermediates in the conversion of lanosterol to cholesterol. The last quarter of the 20th century was when M. Brown and J. Goldstein showed that the low density lipoprotein receptor was a key regulator of cholesterol homeostasis. They have also demonstrated that cholesterol balance in the cell is transcriptionally regulated via the sterol regulatory element binding protein. In the later part of the 20th century drugs were developed that effectively lower plasma cholesterol and lessen the risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据