4.7 Article

Integrin ανβ3 Targeted Gene Delivery Using RGD Peptidomimetic Conjugates with Copolymers of PEGylated Poly(ethylene imine)

期刊

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 1270-1280

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bc9001695

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the synthesis and characterization of five conjugates of poly(ethylene glycol) modified polyethylenimine (PEG-PEIs) coupled in two different synthesis routes to a nonpeptidic pentacyclic RDG-mimetic for integrin receptor-targeted gene delivery. Synthesis of this panel of different conjugates allowed for systematic analysis of structure-activity relationships. Conjugates were therefore characterized regarding molecular composition, DNA condensation, size, and zeta potential of self-assembled polyplexes. In vitro characterization included investigation of blood compatibility, binding affinity to receptor-positive and receptor-negative cells measured by flow cytometry, cellular uptake quantified by scintillation counting, and efficiency and specificity of transfection assayed by reporter gene expression. In a first synthetic approach, low molecular weight PEI (LMW-PEI) was PEGylated using a heterobifunctional PEG linker and coupling of the RGD-mimetic was achieved at the distal end of PEG chains. In a second synthesis route, the RGD-mimetic was directly coupled to AB-block-copolymers of PEI (25 kDa) and PEG (30 kDa). Interactions of RGD-PEG-LMW-PEI conjugates with DNA were strongly impaired, whereas PEG-PEI-RGD conjugates were more promising candidates due to their physicochemical properties and higher receptor specificity. The binding, uptake, and transfection efficiency in receptor-positive cells was strongly increased upon conjugation of the RGD-mimetic to AB-block-copolymers of PEG-PEI and depended on the degree of peptide substitution. The conjugates of PEG-PEI AB-block-copolymers with low ligand density of the RGD-mimetic appear to be promising candidates for in vivo cancer gene therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据