4.8 Article

Functional redundancy of cryptochromes and classical photoreceptors for nonvisual ocular photoreception in mice

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.260498597

关键词

circadian photoreceptor; c-fos; suprachiasmatic nucleus

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 EY000403] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [K08-EY00403] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM031082, GM31082, R37 GM031082] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The daily light-dark (LD) cycle exerts a powerful influence on the temporal organization of behavior and physiology. Much of this influence is preserved in behaviorally blind retinally degenerate mice; the photoreceptors underlying this nonvisual phototransduction are unknown. The mammalian eye contains at least two classes of photoactive pigments, the vitamin A-based opsins and the vitamin B-2-based cryptochromes. To genetically define the roles of these pigments in light modulation of behavior, we generated rd/rd;mCry1(-)/mCry1(-);mCry2(-)/mCry2(-) mutant mice lacking rods and most cones as well as both cryptochrome proteins. The response of the mutant mouse to photic input was analyzed at both behavioral and molecular levels. behaviorally, mice lacking either classical photoreceptors or cryptochromes exhibited strongly rhythmic locomotor responses to 10 and 100 lux daily LD 12 h/12-h cycles; however, triple mutant mice carrying both cryptochrome and retinal degenerate mutations were nearly arrhythmic under both LD cycles and in constant darkness. At the molecular level, the light induction of c-fos transcription in the suprachiasmatic nucleus was markedly reduced in the triple mutant mouse compared with either rd/rd or cryptochrome mutant mice. These data indicate that classical opsins and cryptochromes serve functionally redundant roles in the transduction of light information to behavioral modulation and suggest a pleomorphic role for cryptochromes in both photoreception and central clock mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据