4.6 Article

Activation of p42/44 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases by extracellular calcium-sensing receptor agonists induces mitogenic responses in the mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cell line

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3955

关键词

calcium-sensing receptor; osteoblast; proliferation; MAPK; p42/44; p38

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK41415, DK48330, DK52005] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, substantial evidence has accumulated that the G-protein-coupled, extracellular calcium (Ca-o(2+))-sensing receptor (CaR) is expressed in bone marrow-derived cells, including osteoblasts, stromal cells, monocytes-macrophages, and osteoclast precursor cells. Our previous studies have shown that the mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cell line also expresses the CaR and exhibits mitogenic responses when exposed to various CaR agonists. In this study, in order to understand the signaling pathway(s) mediating this response, we studied the effects of CaR agonists on the phosphorylation of p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (Erk1/2), p38 MAPK, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in MC3T3-E1 cells. Raising the level of Ca-o(2+) (4.5 mM) or addition of the polycationic CaR agonists, gadolinium (Gd3+) (25 muM), neomycin (300 muM) or spermine (1 mM), each stimulated phosphorylation of both p42/44 and p38 MAPKs, but not JNK, as assessed using phospho-specific antibodies to the respective MAPKs. Furthermore, phosphorylation of p42/44 and p38 MAPK were markedly inhibited by their selective and potent inhibitors, PD98059 (50 muM) and SB203580 (10 muM), respectively. Finally, the two inhibitors suppressed [H-3]thymidine incorporation into DNA in MC3T3-E1 cells at a normal level of Ca-o(2+) (1.8 mM) as well as when stimulated by high (4.5 mM) Ca-o(2+), Gd3+, or neomycin. Thus, in mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells, both the p42/44 and p38 MAPK cascades play pivotal roles in CaR-stimulated mitogenic responses. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据