4.7 Article

Is ferromagnetism an intrinsic property of the CuII/GdIII couple?: 2.: Structures and magnetic properties of novel trinuclear complexes with μ-phenolato-μ-oximato (Cu-Ln-Cu) cores (Ln = La, Ce, Gd)

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 39, 期 26, 页码 5994-6000

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic000666u

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present paper is devoted to the study of original trinuclear (Cu-II, Ln(III), Cu-II) complexes (Ln = La, Ce, Gd) They derive from the polydentate ligands H2Li (i = 1, 3, 4) represented in Figure 1. The crystal and molecular structures of two complexes have been determined at room temperature. The (Cu, Gd, Cu) complex of H2L1 1Gd and the (Cu, Ce, Cu) complex of H2L3 3Ce crystallize in the triclinic space group P (1) over bar (no. 2) with the following cell parameters: a = 14.005(2) Angstrom, b = 14.7581(13) Angstrom, c = 11.3549(13) Angstrom, alpha = 96.273(9)degrees, beta = 97.648(11)degrees, gamma = 72.946(9)degrees, V = 2217.7(4) Angstrom (3), and Z = 2 for 1Gd and a = 11.226(2) Angstrom, b = 16.927(3) Angstrom, c = 11.010(2) Angstrom, alpha = 108.67(2)degrees, beta = 110.48(1)degrees, gamma = 92.35(2)degrees, V = 1828.7(5) Angstrom (3), and Z = 2 for 3Ce. Regarding possible supports for magnetic interactions, it may be noted that, in both complexes, each of the main bridging pathways between the equatorial positions of a copper(II) ion and the related lanthanide ion is double and not symmetrical. It involves a phenolate oxygen atom and an oximato nitrogen-oxygen pair of atoms, The resulting Cu(O,N-O)Gd networks are not planar, but 3Ce displays much larger deviations than does 1Gd. Determination of the thermal dependence of chi (M) (molar susceptibility) and the field variations of M (magnetization) show that in 3Gd and 4Gd the Cu-Gd interactions are antiferromagnetic while more usual ferromagnetic interactions are observed for 1Gd. The possibility of a relationship between structural and magnetic parameters is considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据