3.8 Article

Impairment of mitochondrial respiration after cerebral hypoxia-ischemia in immature rats: relationship to activation of caspase-3 and neuronal injury

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 125, 期 1-2, 页码 43-50

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-3806(00)00111-5

关键词

neonatal; rat; cerebral; hypoxia-ischemia; brain damage; mitochondria; caspase-3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial damage may play a key role in the development of necrotic and apoptotic hypoxic-ischemic (HI) brain damage. It has previously been shown that mitochondrial respiration is depressed in the cerebral cortex after HI in neonatal animals. The aim of the present study was to further characterize the time course of the mitochondrial impairment during reperfusion and the correlation between the respiratory control ratio and brain injury and activation of caspase-3. Rat pups were subjected to unilateral carotid artery ligation and exposed to hypoxia (7.7% oxygen). Mitochondrial respiration was measured 0-72 h after HI in a mitochondrial fraction isolated from cerebral cortex. Microtubule associated protein-2 (MAP2) and caspase-3 were analyzed with immunoblotting in cerebral cortex homogenates. Tn addition, the time course of caspase-3 was measured as DEVD cleavage. The mitochondrial respiratory control ratio in cerebral cortex decreased immediately after HI followed by a partial recovery at 3-8 h. Thereafter, a secondary drop occurred with a minimum reached at 24 h of reperfusion. The secondary loss of respiratory function was accompanied by depletion of MAP2, cleavage of caspase-3 and an increased caspase-3 -like activity. at 3-24 h after the insult. In conclusion, the primary phase of mitochondrial dysfunction was paralleled by a moderate decrease of MAP2 and a limited activation of caspase-3. The secondary mitochondrial impairment was associated with neuronal injury and pronounced activation of caspase-3. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据