4.7 Article

Topography and isotherms revisited:: the influence of laterally migrating drainage divides

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 184, 期 1, 页码 287-303

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00315-0

关键词

topography; isotherms; low temperature; geochronology; watersheds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drainage divides of mountain ranges will shift laterally during asymmetric erosion of the range. Such asymmetric erosion may occur due to differential precipitation on different sides of a range, or because of different topographic gradients, for example at passive margins. Here, a semi-analytical solution is presented that can be used to evaluate the shape of isotherms underneath an asymmetrically eroding, randomly shaped topography. It is shown that, because of this asymmetric erosion, cooling curves of rocks from the slowly denuding side of the range (in shift direction of divide) are characterized by a decrease in cooling rate with decreasing temperature, while cooling curves of rocks from the rapidly denuding side (in lee of the shift direction) are characterized by increasing cooling rate with decreasing temperature. Moreover, in rapidly denuding terrains, cooling through the 110 degreesC and 75 degreesC isotherms (approximating the retention temperatures of the apatite fission track and (U-Th)/He systems, respectively) may occur on the slowly denuding side of a range at twice the age of samples from the rapidly denuding side. In general, differences in cooling curves and cooling ages below 110 degreesC should be recognizable in terrains where the erosion and lateral migration rates are of the order of 2 mm per year or more. In view of the recent developments of low temperature geochronological methods, our model provides an important tool to estimate the rate of lateral migration of drainage divides in regions where this is not constrained by the geomorphological record. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据