4.5 Article

Crystal structure of the external aldimine of Citrobacter freundii methionine γ-lyase with glycine provides insight in mechanisms of two stages of physiological reaction and isotope exchange of α- and β-protons of competitive inhibitors

期刊

BIOCHIMIE
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 161-167

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2014.01.007

关键词

Pyridoxal 5 '-phosphate dependent enzyme; Methionine gamma-lyase; Isotopic exchange of protons; Concerted mechanism; Stereoselectivity

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Researches [11-04-01535-a, 14-04-00349-a]
  2. President of the Russian Federation [2046.2014.4]
  3. Russian Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three-dimensional structure of the external aldimine of Citrobacter freundii methionine gamma-lyase with competitive inhibitor glycine has been determined at 2.45 A resolution. It revealed subtle conformational changes providing effective binding of the inhibitor and facilitating labilization of C alpha-protons of the external aldimine. The structure shows that 1, 3-prototropic shift of C alpha-proton to C4'-atom of the cofactor may proceed with participation of active site Lys210 residue whose location is favorable for performing this transformation by a concerted mechanism. The observed stereoselectivity of isotopic exchange of enantiotopic C alpha-protons of glycine may be explained on the basis of external aldimine structure. The exchange of C alpha-pro-(R)-proton of the external aldimine might proceed in the course of the concerted transfer of the proton from C alpha-atom of glycine to C4'-atom of the cofactor. The exchange of C alpha-pro-(S)proton may be performed with participation of Tyr113 residue which should be present in its basic form. The isotopic exchange of beta-protons, which is observed for amino acids bearing longer side groups, may be effected by two catalytic groups: Lys210 in its basic form, and Tyr113 acting as a general acid. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据