4.5 Review

Idiosyncrasies in decoding mitochondrial genomes

期刊

BIOCHIMIE
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 95-106

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2014.01.004

关键词

Mitochondria; Codon usage; Transfer RNA; Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase

资金

  1. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-10-IDEX-0002-02]
  2. University of Strasbourg
  3. CNRS
  4. Ministere de l'Education Nationale
  5. de la Recherche et de la Technologie
  6. Investissements d'Avenir program [ANR-10-IDEX-0002-02]
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-10-IDEX-0002] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria originate from the alpha-proteobacterial domain of life. Since this unique event occurred, mitochondrial genomes of protozoans, fungi, plants and metazoans have highly derived and diverged away from the common ancestral DNA. These resulting genomes highly differ from one another, but all present-day mitochondrial DNAs have a very reduced coding capacity. Strikingly however, ATP production coupled to electron transport and translation of mitochondrial proteins are the two common functions retained in all mitochondrial DNAs. Paradoxically, most components essential for these two functions are now expressed from nuclear genes. Understanding how mitochondrial translation evolved in various eukaryotic models is essential to acquire new knowledge of mitochondrial genome expression. In this review, we provide a thorough analysis of the idiosyncrasies of mitochondrial translation as they occur between organisms. We address this by looking at mitochondrial codon usage and tRNA content. Then, we look at the aminoacyl-tRNA-forming enzymes in terms of peculiarities, dual origin, and alternate function(s). Finally we give examples of the atypical structural properties of mitochondrial tRNAs found in some organisms and the resulting adaptive tRNA-protein partnership. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据