4.7 Article

Searching fee and non-fee toxicology information resources: an overview of selected databases

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 157, 期 1-2, 页码 89-110

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-483X(00)00361-9

关键词

databases; bibliographic; databases; factual; online systems; toxicology databases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Toxicology profiles organize information by broad subjects, the first of which affirms identity of the agent studied. Studies here show two non-fee databases (ChemFinder and ChemIDplus) verify the identity of compounds with high efficiency (63% and 73% respectively) with the fee-based Chemical Abstracts Registry file serving well to fill data gaps (100%,). Continued searching proceeds using knowledge of structure scope and content to select databases. Valuable sources for information are factual databases that collect data and facts in special subject areas organized in formats available for analysis or use. Some sources representative of factual files are RTECS, CCRIS, HSDB, GENE-TOX and IRIS, Numerous factual databases offer a wealth of reliable information: however. exhaustive searches probe information published in journal articles and/or technical reports with records residing in bibliographic databases such as BIOSIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, TOXLINE and Web of Science. Listed with descriptions are numerous factual and bibliographic databases supplied by 11 producers. Given the multitude of options and resources. it is often necessary to seek service desk assistance. Questions were posed by telephone and e-mail to service desks at DIALOG, ISI, MEDLARS, Micromedex and STN International. Results of the survey are reported. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据