4.5 Review

A crosstalk between p21 and UPR-induced transcription factor C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) linked to type 2 diabetes

期刊

BIOCHIMIE
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 19-27

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.11.003

关键词

ER-stress; UPR; Diabetes; Apoptosis; CHOP; p21

资金

  1. European Union (European Social Fund - ESF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a disease that is characterized by raised levels of glucose in the blood combined with insulin resistance and relative insulin deficiency. The pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes is associated with the induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR). While UPR aims to restore tissue homeostasis following stress of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), prolonged ER stress triggers apoptosis at least in part through the unfolded protein response (UPR)-activated transcription factor C/EBP (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein) homologous protein (CHOP). CHOP has elevated as a critical mediator connecting accumulation and aggregation of unfolded proteins in the ER and oxidative stress and also contributes to the induction of apoptosis in beta-cell (beta-cell) - cells under conditions of increased insulin demand. p21 is a cell cycle regulator that is implicated in the regulation of the UPR by various mechanisms involving inhibition of apoptosis and facilitation of the regeneration capacity of the beta cells. In this review we summarize the role of ER stress in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes which is associated with the induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR). We also review recent evidence associating p21 activity with beta cell health and regenerative capacity by mechanisms that may interfere with the effects of p21 in the UPR or operate independently of ER stress. Most likely understanding the molecular details of the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes will be beneficial for the management of the disease. (C) 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据