4.7 Article

Age-dependent changes in brain, CSF, and plasma amyloid β protein in the Tg2576 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 372-381

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-02-00372.2001

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; neurodegeneration; Tg2576 transgenic animal model; amyloid beta protein; cerebrospinal fluid; plasma

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG15453, P01 AG015453] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accumulation of amyloid beta protein (A beta) in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) was evaluated by ELISA, immunoblotting, and immunocytochemistry. Changes in A beta begin at 6-7 months as SDS-insoluble forms of A beta 42 and A beta 40 that require formic acid for solubilization appear. From 6 to 10 months, these insoluble forms increase exponentially. As insoluble A beta appears, SDS-soluble A beta decreases slightly, suggesting that it may be converting to an insoluble form. Our data indicate that it is full-length unmodified A beta that accumulates initially in Tg2576 brain. SDS-resistant A beta oligomers and most A beta species that are N-terminally truncated or modified develop only in older Tg2576 mice, in which they are present at levels far lower than in human AD brain. Between 6 and 10 months, when SDS-insoluble A beta 42 and A beta 40 are easily detected in every animal, histopathology is minimal because only isolated A beta cores can be identified. By 12 months, diffuse plaques are evident. From 12 to 23 months, diffuse plaques, neuritic plaques with amyloid cores, and biochemically extracted A beta 42 and A beta 40 increase to levels like those observed in AD brains. Coincident with the marked deposition of A beta in brain, there is a decrease in CSF A beta and a substantial, highly significant decrease in plasma A beta. If a similar decline occurs in human plasma, it is possible that measurement of plasma A beta may be useful as a premorbid biomarker for AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据