4.5 Review

Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine applied to rheumatic diseases: Role of secretome and exosomes

期刊

BIOCHIMIE
卷 95, 期 12, 页码 2229-2234

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.04.017

关键词

Mesenchymal stem cells; Trophic factors; Exosomes; Microparticles; Secretome; Regenerative medicine; Rheumatic diseases

资金

  1. Inserm Institute
  2. University of Montpellier I
  3. European Community

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the last decades, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been extensively studied with regard to their potential applications in regenerative medicine. In rheumatic diseases, MSC-based therapy is the subject of great expectations for patients who are refractory to proposed treatments such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or display degenerative injuries without possible curative treatment, such as osteoarthritis (OA). The therapeutic potential of MSCs has been demonstrated in several pre-clinical models of OA or RA and both the safety and efficacy of MSC-based therapy is being evaluated in humans. The predominant mechanism by which MSCs participate to tissue repair is through a paracrine activity. Via the production of a multitude of trophic factors with various properties, MSCs can reduce tissue injury, protect tissue from further degradation and/or enhance tissue repair. However, a thorough in vivo examination of MSC-derived secretome and strategies to modulate it are still lacking. The present review discusses the current understanding of the MSC secretome as a therapeutic for treatment of inflammatory or degenerative pathologies focusing on rheumatic diseases. We provide insights on and perspectives for future development of the MSC secretome with respect to the release of extracellular vesicles that would have certain advantages over injection of living MSCs or administration of a single therapeutic factor or a combination of factors. (C) 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据