4.5 Article

The occurrence of internal (1→5)-linked arabinofuranose and arabinopyranose residues in arabinogalactan side chains from soybean pectic substances

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE RESEARCH
卷 330, 期 1, 页码 103-114

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)00269-X

关键词

soybean; arabinogalacto-oligosaccharides; internal arabinofuranose residues; terminal arabinopyranose residues

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CDTA-extractable soybean pectic substances were subjected to enzymatic digestion with arabinogalactan degrading enzymes yielding a resistant polymeric pectic backbone and arabino-, galacto-, and arabinogalacto-oligomers. The complex digest was fractionated using size-exclusion chromatography. Monosaccharide composition analysis, HPAEC fractionation and MALDI-TOF MS analysis of the resulting fractions showed that each contained a mixture of oligosaccharides of essentially the same degree of polymerisation, composed of only arabinose and galactose. MALDI-TOF MS analysis was used for molecular mass screening of oligosaccharides in underivatised HPAEC fractions. The monosaccharide sequence and the branching pattern of oligosaccharides (degree of polymerisation from 4 to 8) were determined using linkage analysis and ES-CID tandem MS analysis of the per-O-methylated oligosaccharides in each of the HPAEC fractions. These analyses indicated the presence of common linear (1-->4)-linked galacto-oligosaccharides, and both linear and branched arabino-oligosaccharides. In addition, the results unambiguously showed the presence of oligosaccharides containing (1-->4)-linked galactose residues bearing an arabinopyranose residue as the son-reducing terminal residue, and a mixture of linear oligosaccharides constructed of (1-->4)-linked galactose residues interspersed with an internal (1-->5)-linked arabinofuranose residue. The consequences of these two new structural features of pectic arabinogalactan side chains are discussed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据