4.8 Article

A compactly integrated flow cell with a chemiluminescent FIA system for determining lactate concentration in serum

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 73, 期 2, 页码 373-378

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac000855u

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have fabricated an integrated now cell as a total microanalysis system (mu TAS). This flow cell (size, 15 x 20 mm; total inner volume, 12.2 muL) was designed for a rational analyzing system of lactate determination for serum. This cell was made by micromachining techniques and consisted of two hollows of a lactate oxidase (LOD) reactor and a mixing cell, a spiral groove, and three penetrated holes. To form the reactor and capillary, these patterns, etched on a silicon wafer, were attached to a glass plate by the anodic bonding method. A photodiode was put under part of the spiral capillary. The compactly accumulated devices were integrated into a now injection analysis (FIA) system. In the now cell, lactate was catalyzed to pyruvate and hydrogen peroxide at the LOD reactor; subsequently, hydrogen peroxide reacted with the luminol-ferricyanic reagent at the mixing cell. The resulting chemiluminescent light was detected by the photodiode. Using the miniaturized now cell, the sample volume for one measurement was greatly reduced to 0.2 muL. The response to lactate was obtained within 30s and was linear between 0.5 and 5.0 mM (4.5 and 45 mg/dL) lactate with excellent correlative variances of 3.2% (average of three measurements at 5.0 mM), For practical application, the lactate concentration in control human serum was determined using this system. The results showed a good correlation coefficient (r = 0.979) with the results obtained by the spectrophotometric reference method. No difference in sera (normal or pathological) was found. Consequently, this integrated now cell shows potential as a clinical device for lactate determination in serum. In this article, the effect of the design on the chemiluminescent FIA system is also described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据