4.5 Article

51V MAS NMR investigation of 51V quadrupole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy in divalent metal pyrovanadates

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 105, 期 2, 页码 420-429

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp002882u

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnitudes and relative orientations of V-51 quadrupole coupling and chemical shift tensors have been determined from V-51 magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR spectra at 14.1 T for seven divalent metal pyrovanadates: alpha- and beta -Mg2V2O7, Ca2V2O7, alpha -Zn2V2O7, Cd2V2O7, BaCaV2O7, and alpha -BaZnV2O7. This has been accomplished by least-squares fitting of the integrated spinning sideband intensities observed for the central and satellite transitions employing spectral widths up to 4 MHz. Numerical error analysis of the optimized data reveals that the five NMR parameters characterizing the magnitudes of the quadrupole coupling and chemical shift tensors are obtained with high precision while somewhat larger error limits are observed for the three Euler angles, describing the relative orientation of the two tensors. The optimized data exhibit a significantly higher precision when compared to earlier reported parameters for some of the pyrovanadates, determined from V-51 static-powder or MAS NMR of the central transition only. The V-51 chemical shift parameters indicate that the different conformations for the V2O74- ion in thortveitite-type and dichromatetype pyrovanadates can be distinguished by the sign for the chemical shift anisatropy (delta (o) = delta (iso) - delta (zz)), negative and positive, respectively. A linear correlation is observed between the principal elements for the V-51 quadrupole coupling tensors and calculated electric field gradient tensor elements, obtained from point-monopole calculations. This correlation is used to assign the NMR parameters for the two different crystallographic V-51 sites in the asymmetric units for alpha- and beta -Mg2V2O7, Ca2V2O7, BaCaV2O7, and alpha -BaZnV2O7.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据