4.7 Article

Where are the absorbers toward Q2302+029?

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 547, 期 1, 页码 39-49

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/318351

关键词

large-scale structure of universe; quasars : absorption lines; quasars : individual (Q2302+029)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present images and spectroscopy of objects close to the sight line of Q230+029 in order to search for galaxies responsible for the remarkable z = 0.7 high-ionization absorption-line system found by Jannuzi et al. This system shows normal narrow O VI, N V, and C IV lines superimposed on broader (3000-5000 km s(-1) wide), unsaturated absorption troughs some 56,000 km s(-1) away from the QSO emission redshift (z(em) = 1.052). Despite reaching sensitivities sufficient to detect 1/10L* galaxies in the optical and 1/20L* in the infrared, we are unable to detect any obvious bright galaxies that might be responsible for the absorption beyond approximate to6 h(-1) kpc of the sight line. This supports the hypotheses that the absorption is either intrinsic to the QSO or arises in intracluster gas. Adopting either explanation is problematic: in the first case, associated absorption at such high ejection velocities is difficult to understand, and challenges the conventional discrimination between intrinsic and extrinsic absorbers; in the second case, the gas must reside in a similar to 40 h(-1) Mpc long filament aligned along the line of sight in order to reproduce the broad absorption. Since the absorption system is unusual, such a chance alignment might not be unreasonable. Spectroscopy of objects beyond the immediate vicinity of the QSO sight line reveals a galaxy cluster at z = 0.59, which coincides with strong Ly alpha and more narrow high-ionization lines in the quasar spectrum. Here, too, the lack of galaxies at distances comparable to those found for, e.g., Ly alpha -absorbing galaxies, suggests that the absorption may arise from intracluster gas unassociated with any individual galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据