4.7 Article

An antiparallel four-helix bundle orients the high-affinity RNA binding sites in hnRNP C: A mechanism for RNA chaperonin activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 305, 期 4, 页码 817-828

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4331

关键词

ribonucleoprotein; hnRNP; NMR; leucine zipper; RNA binding

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM48567-08] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have shown that the C protein of 40 S hnRNP complexes contains a leucine-zipper domain, residues 180-207, and that a 40 residue highly basic domain, immediately preceding the zipper, is responsible for almost all of the free energy of RNA binding to C protein. Because this domain arrangement is like that seen in the bZIP transcription factors it has been termed the bZIP-like-motif or bZLM. We report here that the zipper domain drives C protein oligomerization through its spontaneous assembly into an anti-parallel four-helix bundle approximately 50 Angstrom in length. The anti-parallel nature of the four-helix bundle positions the tetramer's four high-affinity RNA binding domains at opposing ends of a rigid core formed by the helix bundle. This domain topology is ideally suited to accommodate and direct a double wrapping of RNA around the tetramer and is fully consistent with C protein's ability to bind and order 230 nt lengths of pre-mRNA through a highly cooperative RNA binding mode. We have used a novel sequence-specific C-13/N-15 labeling strategy and multidimensional NMR spectroscopy to define the anti-parallel orientation of the four-helix bundle and its molecular dimensions. In vitro reconstitution and hydrodynamic studies on native C protein, on several C protein fragments, and on various synthetic peptides, are consistent with the proposed model and indicate that C protein's canonical RNA recognition motifs probably function in tetramer-tetramer interactions during 40 S hnRNP assembly. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据