4.4 Article

Evidence for iterative ratcheting of receptor-bound hsp70 between its ATP and ADP conformations during assembly of glucocorticoid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 1109-1116

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi002399+

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA76581] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK31573] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hsp90 and hsp70 are essential components of a five-protein system, including also the nonessential cochaperones Hop, hsp40, and p23, that assembles glucocorticoid receptor (CR).hsp90 heterocomplexes and causes the simultaneous opening of the steroid binding pocket to access by steroid. The first event in assembly is the ATP-dependent and hsp40 (YDJ-1)-dependent binding of hsp70 to the GR, which primes the receptor for subsequent ATP-dependent activation by hsp90 [Morishima, Y., Murphy, P. J. M., Li, D. P., Sanchez, E. R., and Pratt, W. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18054-18060]. Here, we demonstrate that, during the priming step, ATP-bound hsp70 is converted to GR-bound hsp70 that is similar to1/3 in the ADP- and similar to2/3 in the ATP-dependent conformation. In the second step, hsp90, which is provided in the non-nucleotide-bound state, is converted to GR-bound hsp90 in the ATP-dependent conformation. The ATPase activity of hsp70 is K+-dependent, and the priming step is K+-dependent. Surprisingly, the subsequent hsp90-dependent step, which is rate-limiting for receptor activation, is also potassium-dependent. This suggests that CR-bound hsp70 is also converted from the ATP-dependent to the ADP-dependent conformation while it cooperates with hsp90 to activate steroid binding activity. Because the priming step requires both sustained high levels of ATP and YDJ-1 for optimal activity and because both steps require potassium, we predict that receptor-bound hsp70 undergoes iterative ratcheting between its ATP-and ADP-dependent conformations in opening the hydrophobic steroid binding pocket.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据